Heroes, or heroines, do not come much more improbable than lawyer Barbara Hewson. Who would have thought that this champion of women’s rights, with a reputation to protect as a successful, high-profile advocate in leading cases, would suddenly throw caution to the winds and call very publicly for the age of consent to be lowered to 13, as she has done this week?
It’s a British story, and it has been all over the media here, replete with predictable reactions, including “shock” at the large London law firm where she is one of many barristers, who are all self-employed members of the “chambers”, or law practice team. It all kicked off with an article by Hewson in the lively libertarian online journal Spiked, to which sociologist Frank Furedi is a regular contributor: see After Savile: Policing as entertainment, mentioned here recently.
Hewson’s article, like Furedi’s, arose from the Savile “scandal” last year and Operation Yewtree, the massive police attention to “historic” so-called child sexual abuse that has been going on ever since, with seemingly almost daily arrests, especially of aging celebrities such as the entertainer Rolf Harris, the former pop star Gary Glitter, the DJ Dave Lee Travis, the comedian Jim Davidson and the PR guru Max Clifford, all of whom deny any offence. TV legend Stuart Hall, by contrast, recently pleaded guilty to offences which Hewson, with an admirable sense of perspective, dismissed as “low-level misdemeanors” involving teenagers.
She began her article in a starkly combative fashion:
I do not support the persecution of old men. The manipulation of the rule of law by the Savile Inquisition – otherwise known as Operation Yewtree – and its attendant zealots poses a far graver threat to society than anything Jimmy Savile ever did.
She goes on to compare the present moral panic with the one in Victorian England which led to the age of consent being raised from 13 to 16 in 1885. Turning to the present scene, she says the so-called abuse relates to relatively trivial matters routinely exaggerated by pressure groups such as the NSPCC. The NSPCC and the Metropolitan Police Force, as reported here at Heretic TOC, produced a joint report into Savile’s alleged offending in January, called Giving Victims a Voice. It was noted here that this report outrageously treated the allegations as proven facts. Now Hewson lends the considerable authority of her legal standing to this point:
Note how the police and NSPCC assume the roles of judge and jury. What neither acknowledges is that this national trawl for historical victims was an open invitation to all manner of folk to reinterpret their experience of the past as one of victimization.
Quite. She says that the acute problem of proof which stale allegations entail also generates a demand that criminal courts should afford accusers therapy, by giving them “a voice”’, an infantilizing function that undermines judicial impartiality and fair hearings.
Hewson concludes with a trio of proposed law reforms: remove complainant anonymity; introduce a strict statute of limitations for criminal prosecutions and civil actions; and reduce the age of consent to 13.
Typifying the mainstream media response, the Daily Telegraph ran a column by another lawyer, Malcolm Underhill. Regarding the proposed age of consent reform, he wrote:
This suggestion must rate as one of the most foolish proposals on the issue of child welfare that has been laid before the public. If the proposal is adopted by Government, such a change would be a green light for paedophiles, sending the completely wrong message.
I love the “If the proposal is adopted by Government” bit, don’t you? Ha! We should be so lucky! Alas, one maverick lawyer’s speech does not a government policy make. But it’s a start. Meanwhile, the reality is that the craziness in the UK goes on, and is getting worse by the day. Remember, this from If cardinal sinners and lordly lotharios float your boat… , a Heretic TOC blog in March?
… can it really be…yes, it’s one of the nation’s favourite TV soap opera stars, charged with “child rape”. Plus one, two – no it’s three – God it’s gone up to four; bloody hell it’s FIVE musical maestros from one of the most famous music academies in the land: all of them facing the music for vilely fiddling with their violin students!
Guess what the figure is now for those music teachers? I was shocked by five of them being in trouble. Well now (or at the latest count), there are thirty nine, yes, THIRTY NINE, music teachers under investigation at that academy, Chetham’s school of music, plus one other, the Royal Northern College of Music, both in Manchester.
Enough already! Enough of this lunacy for one day!
Enough, too, in a way, for Heretic TOC, who now finds himself obliged to make an unwelcome but very necessary announcement. I love writing this blog and if I had the time I would gladly post a thousand words or more every day rather than roughly twice a week, which has been the usual rate since this “not the dominant narrative” started just over six months ago. Sadly, though, my time is coming under more and more pressure. I have a variety of other projects in hand which are too frequently being left on the back burner. This cannot go on. Accordingly, I have decided to post only once per week, or possibly only twice per month, from now on. This might even be a relief for readers struggling to keep abreast of all this heresy! With posts becoming somewhat less regular, though, it will become harder to know when a new post has arrived. Accordingly, for the benefit of those who have not already done so, I would suggest becoming a “follower” of the blog, so that you get an email each time a new piece is posted. All you need to do is press the “Follow” button in the brown bar across the very top of the page, just to the right of where it says Heretic TOC.
even when the teenager is legally allowed to consent like spain for instance where it is 13,parents often control their every day life,to the extent where they think they cannot make decisions for themselves.in THEORY it would hurt when you are seen as a predator,especially when the attraction is mutual.of course one may be a side issue to a revelation such as is our son a homosexual.some immigrant cultures this war is still ongoing.its hard to imagine a free society,where you could embrace your young lover,not just in public but in front of the parents.
Spain is a very conservative Catholic country, where much of this business as in other countries is not that of the state but of the church. Note that in the Anglophone common law countries in which these debates currently rage, it is state bureaucrats driving them; in Western Australia for example specifically against the influence of the church.
With respect for these other ‘immigrant cultures’, the primary concern is and has long been with Islamic immigrants; interesting to me of the same family of belief as Judaism and Christianity, and little different.
Contrast these with Aboriginal and Indigenous cultures across the Southern Hemisphere; Australia and Oceania in particular, where away from pressure from the Anglophone state system (NZ, for example), people live pretty much as freely as they always have.
The rule generally among such ‘primitives’ is, far better for children learn about life early, and be prepared, and manage.
Which century are you talking about, Gil? The Inquisition was some time ago. Things have moved on, especially since the death of General Franco. Spain, like Ireland and other supposedly “conservative” Catholic countries, have modernised and are much more secular these days.
Well, yes, relatively ‘modernised’, and more ‘secular’ – they have to be to some extent, or appear to be, else nobody will invest in those countries, expecting a return on their capital outlay.
Even today they are economically marginal, susceptible to fluctuations, and for that reason I yet dared to assert ‘very conservative’ rather than ‘modern’ compared to ‘medieval inquisition’, or ‘secular’ compared to Franco and De Valera.
From 1997 to 2001 I spent over 3 1/2 years in post graduate field research with the Centre for Irish Studies at Murdoch University, as part of my 15 years in that capacity in the Lower Southwest of WA (where I was finally arrested not merely BTW).
It was then that I realised how yawningly wide the gulf remains between even relatively conservative Western Europe on the one hand, and liberal enlightenment on the other, and if you like (as mentioned) the Indigenous world on the third.
We speak here of entirely different planets. At times I wonder whether they even orbit about the same sun . . .
All I really care about, prosaically, is when the bathroom is full of boys having their shower I am allowed to go in there nonetheless and take a piss, and not have my house raided from some distant galaxy arguing that I acted indecently.
Or when they gather around the bowl to piss with me, or gamboling naked about the house after their shower and I suggest they go get their pajamas on, suddenly I’m abusing them.
Or even more curiously, in an Irish Catholic town, when a child wants to sit in my lap so he can reach the keyboard while he plays his computer game, so I can show him how to do it, I am not arrested and ultimately imprisoned for ‘touching the front of his pants’.
That’s what I mean by ‘very conservative’, church driven, whatever . . . bizarre, really, entirely loopy . . . call it what you want . . . the simple fact remains that Irish Catholic conservatives were in power here at the time, and there has been hell to pay since.
BTW, there are very large numbers of Irish, Spanish and Italians out here right now looking for jobs and accommodation, alongside the Afghanis, Iraqis and Iranians. I know, I’m letting rooms.
Still being missed in all this; nothing whatsoever to do with sex or children or any such reality, and certainly nothing to do with some putative ‘general culture’ or ‘society’, is the simple fact that encouraged by IBM (now owner of SPSS) and Microsoft, police in all the Anglophone common law countries are now policing by ‘data’.
They sit there at their desk all day trawling through endless databases – rather than foot or vehicle patrols to see for themselves what is actually going down somewhere or other.
First observation to be made is the now old truism in computing; to wit, GIGO – Garbage In Garbage Out.
Second observation to be made is that there are still no data standardisation, coherent interconnectivity, or cross-referencing of existing databases.
Yewtree is a classic example of the way interviewers and data entry staff decide for themselves that their phone-in respondents making certain statements, or what sounded to them like certain statements, are automatically victims of Child Sexual Abuse.
The third observation to be made is that police recruits with no computing, data entry, database management or data interpretive skills are sat in front of a computer and told to report any incident ‘flagged’ by ‘the system’.
Only a month or so ago, while entertaining guests at dinner, two police arrived on my doorstep, banging on the door telling me I had been reported driving a car registered to a woman.
Yes, my ex-wife’s old car. My son drives it, since she bought a new one, and I drove it down to the pub to buy a couple of bottles of stout. You could have cross-referenced the simple fact; both our marriage and eventually our divorce are both formally registered.
Back in the real world, and regardless of any sort of ‘Age of Consent Law’, believe me when I say, 12-13-14 year-old kids are bonking away as merrily as ever. The happy smile and the gleam in the eye notwithstanding, until somebody complains nobody else will ever know what took place between them.
The longest running debate on this matter in recent years concerned a case of two 12 year-olds in Kansas, in which nobody could decide which of them was the perpetrator and which was the victim; and worse, the beguiling question of how could the same person be both perpetrator and victim in the commission of the same crime?
Gad! the mind truly boggles!
This is going to turn into more fun than ever, as time goes by and the truth unravels.
It would appear that Furedi used this incident in a similar manner to how you used the Michael Jackson case. http://tinyurl.com/cekpnhg . That is good. It is difficult to find a way to get our perspective into the general culture, and using an issue in the popular culture as a means of doing this is an excellent strategy. The courage of these people from Spiked is awesome.
There are two issues here. First, can thes issues be discussed within the mainstream? Second, is the mainstream perspective accurate? At this point I think the first issue is the more important one to focus on. The facts are on our side. It is only by evading dialogue that the forces of repression and hysteria can prevail.
Jim
And still the huge elephant in the room, which the gutless UK bent-Cops/Media in deep denial dare not investigate.
Their own grotesque 30 years neglect of TWO major flaws in proven corrupt judicial and journalistic systems.
1. The rampant ‘ambulance chasing’ Compensation Culture conducted by all low income false-claimants ‘criminals’ committing Serious Fraud while Peverting The Course Of Justice, Fabricating Evidence and much more. Check the 1999-2001 landmark cases: Jonathan King; plus David Jones/Basil Williams-Rigsby/Mike Lawson (ex-police Sgt) which SHOULD have then stopped this tsunami of corruption for greed, ratings, profit.
2. Corrupt ‘Trawling’ by police with all untaped ‘prime’-interviews, inciting, facilitating, and colluding with all low income false claimants ‘criminals’. ALL committing Serious Fraud while Perverting The Course Of Justice, Fabricating Evidence, and much more. Yet all unreported by our bent-media, and still hidden from the, kept ignorant, mainstream public.
What’s missing is often most telling. Odd, or not that NOT ONE wealthy complainant/ claimant EVER, about historic touching, or worse ? Yet many of the wealthiest were sent to Anglo elite education from age 8 where by any criteria ‘Child Abuse’, both sexual and non-sexual was rampant ?
And does ‘Hillsborough’ ring a bell or three ? Then perhaps expect these vast criminal collusions to all come out fully in about 20+ years. Circa 2035 when, again, for TRUE victims it’s all too late. Except that one of the current culprits ‘Mass Deception Expert’ Mark Williams Thomas might be dragged from his retirement, like so many ‘oldies’ recently, and ‘perp walked’ for public pillory; before receiving BIG bang up !
Bring it on !!
Meanwhile:
Yet more celebrity arrests.
http://www.kingofhits.co.uk/index.php?option=com_kunena&Itemid=65&func=view&catid=2&id=97886
Yet more police power, exploiting the all growth, recession-free new industry.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/yewtree-police-set-aside-240000-to-hire-exofficers-as-private-detectors-to-deal-with-flood-of-jimmy-savile-allegations-8611748.html
A close friend I have here in NZ has pointed out to me this kind of statement by a lawyer has been made in NZ space (April, 2003) – Colin Amery (NZ lawyer) “said a change in the legal age was needed because children were now able to make decisions earlier about when they had sex, and society’s attitudes had relaxed since the laws were last changed in 1961.”
This voice was countered by the NZ Children’s Commissioner (Roger McClay) who attacked Amery’s suggestion by stating, “What is he saying. ‘Let’s not call it abuse let’s call it consensual’?”
As if to show the rest of us who is in charge the penalties for sex with minors was increased a short time later. The new legislation The Crimes Amemdment Act came into effect in May, 2005. In fact a whole range of legal changes steped up penalties for pornography and provisions for extended supervison of those released from prison.
In the British situaiton now there is a claim by Ellie Combo (she is part of a group that setup what the Guardian refers to as grassroots network UK Feminista) that to lower the age of consent is an insult to victims of sexual abuse – “strikingly cruel to victims who have now come forward to speak about the lasting impact of abuse.”
Let’s all hope England does not display the same trend to become even more punitive in the period that follows a voice of reason in public spaces. I must acknowledge causal relationships in social science are often difficult to constuct in a convincing way.
“Lawyer says sex should be legal for 14-year-olds” http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=3402111
“Legal age for sex protects children, says McClay”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=3450394
“Reacting to child abuse by lowering the age of consent would be cruel”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/10/child-abuse-age-of-consent
A call to stop bashing old men and become more honest about how laws should be drafted when discussing the sexual lives of the young does seem so realistic as to be ‘strange and unbelievable’. At this point in time I don’t see the British public, or the one where I live in New Zealand, buying such moves. Mind you I am very impressed to hear these things said!
The move to post less because the of the time you have available is understandable Tom, that approach is my own.