It is exactly a year since the launch of Heretic TOC. Time to celebrate, then?
I can’t honestly say I am in party mood. There will be no birthday cake with a solitary candle to blow out. We heretics are too close to being snuffed out ourselves for that to be good symbolism. The very first blog, titled The real silenced voices, began with the words “Are we in the midst of paedogeddon?” This was a reference to the Jimmy Savile upheaval, and the short answer to the question still looks horribly like “Yes”. Only this week there was further fallout in the UK from this endlessly radioactive saga, when the outgoing Director of Public Prosecutions called for non-reporting of “child sexual abuse” to be made a criminal offence.
Celebration, then, is out of place, but a glance backwards is definitely in order. Starting at the beginning, which seems as good a place as any, I am amazed to discover there are no fewer than 15 blogs in the November 2012 archive, all published in the last three weeks of that month. I struggle now with one a week, but that was nearly one a day! How on earth did I find time for that? Well, for one thing, brevity: the first blog was under 300 words, whereas these days it always seems the job needs at least 1500. It’s not that I’m waffling more, is it? I honestly don’t think so. The concise, punchy, opinion piece is always a readable and popular item but Heretic TOC aspires to be a bit more than that now, with a rather more thoroughly researched and in-depth approach. Not everyone will like it but at least I can report that a small but clearly intelligent and knowledgeable following does appear to appreciate what is on offer here.
Or perhaps not so small, as I am not sure what the standard of comparison should be. There are millions of blogs out there now, about half of which are read by no one but the blogger who writes them! Further comparative figures of this sort were contemplated in A thousand hits in ten days, a title which says it all about Heretic TOC’s encouraging initial following. So how do the stats stack up now? Writing a few days ahead of the anniversary, it looks as though there will be over 65,000 hits in the year, which makes 1,250 hits per week, or nearly 180 per day. This looks like a strong improvement over the start-up period of 100 per day, but the figures are flattered by a boost up to over 300 per day in January when Heretic TOC was initially featured as a new entry on Boylinks. The average per day in the last quarter has settled to a steady but less heady 145 or so, including a core of 40 “followers” who have asked for email notification when each Heretic TOC piece appears.
I am told these figures could probably be increased considerably by judicious use of Twitter. I can well imagine. Stephen Fry, for instance, has over six million followers: tweeting him cleverly enough, so that he notices and responds, would really put a blog on the map. But that’s small fry, if you’ll excuse the pun: Justin Beiber has not six million but forty six million followers! Presumably, though, many of those would be minors (dangerous!), and I’m guessing few of the true “beliebers”, minor or major, would be up for Heretic TOC’s rather cerebral style. I keep telling myself it is high time I started getting into this Twitter thing but somehow it never seems to happen – showing my age, I suppose.
One feature of Heretic TOC that has definitely not been small is the sheer amount of blogging and readers’ comments. The 88 blogs published within the year, including guest blogs, probably (no exact stats on this) amount to around 150,000 words. Nearly 1,300 readers comments have been published, i.e. around 15 per blog on average, and despite my occasional pleas for brevity I reckon around half a million words of comment have appeared, not all of them rude! That represents a lot of work by you, dear readers, which I have been delighted to see. At a guess, about two thirds of that has been really good stuff, in my view, and has needed very little moderation. The remaining material, though, including posts which had to be rejected on grounds of personal abuse, repetition of previous positions, incoherence, etc., involved me in some very difficult – indeed at times utterly draining and exasperating – bouts of moderating. This, indeed, has been by far my toughest task, which has at times thoroughly tested my capacity to be as calm, fair and objective as a moderator ought to be.
This brings me to what I think may be the most useful aspect of this “backward glance”. I could spend an agreeable time trawling through the archive, hunting out those blogs I most enjoyed writing, or those on the most significant themes, or the ones that elicited the greatest response. Instead, I feel I should focus on my judgement – which was just a vague feeling at first, but growing stronger with every passing month – that not every heresy here is of equal value, whether my own or those of other contributors. But presenting Heretic TOC as “Not the dominant discourse”, it seemed wrong for this blog, of all blogs, to discriminate against, and suppress, any views just because I disagree with them.
That is a position I am pleased and proud to maintain, but as time has gone on I have become surer than ever that I am keen to encourage intelligent discussion rather than just mindless ranting and raving. Many of the early contributions were excellent. That remains the case; and latterly, I am pleased to say, the proportion of really thoughtful and well informed posts has been rising significantly too. Not that this should deter anyone from dashing off relatively trivial contributions, especially if there is an element of humour. The last thing Heretic TOC wants is to give the impression everything has to be polished to perfection before hitting the send button: spontaneity is fine, speling misteaks are welcum!
To say, at this natural time for assessment, what I like to see at Heretic TOC is relatively easy: it is my personal blog, after all, so I need only introspect. A much tougher question is what, if anything, the blog might objectively be thought to achieve. Is it an end in itself? Does it aspire, immodestly, to change the world? Others will have their own views on the potential and the limitations of such a forum and may choose to comment accordingly. I would guess that a blog needs a readership base about a thousand times as big as Heretic TOC’s before it stands any chance of being politically influential to a discernible level. And unlike the Virtuous Pedophiles, whose message, even if we hate it, clearly has some appeal in “liberal” media outlets, the heresies voiced here at Heretic TOC are likely to be shunned by the wider world in the foreseeable future.
What, then, is the point? To be entirely honest, I am not sure. I know there are umpteen blogs I want to write, and that I am in absolutely no danger whatever of running out of things to say. On the contrary, my problem with every blog is trying to focus on one small theme rather than going off on all sorts of interesting tangents. But I do sometimes wonder whether – since writing seems to be in my blood – I might do better to concentrate my limited time on authoring books, or submitting articles to academic journals. What do you think?
STOP PRESS: Having struck a note of existential angst here, suddenly comes news of what may be a really important function this blog could perform immediately: like, today. Well, almost today. Tomorrow, I hope. First, I just want to let today’s blog sink in, although what happens in the next 24 hours, or 48 at most, could blow away the doubts. We’ll see. I may be getting overexcited. You can be the judge of that in due course. Just watch this space over the weekend.
[…] title of my anniversary blog said a lot about the existential crisis Heretic TOC was undergoing: What’s the point of it all, really? At that time, too, there were some really good commentators, but I felt newcomers were being put […]
[This is intended as a reply to your last post in the Chetham’s thread — for some reason there’s no reply button there.]
You didn’t mention Chetham’s in the blog itself, but you did put it as a tag, so Pace may have searched for that. His TES piece is a reply to one by Claire Fox, who belongs to the same set of Marxist libertarians as Barbara Hewson, Frank Furedi etc.. He opposes her criticism of the panic and calls for (even) more hypersensitivity toward “grooming”, so not someone who is in any way on the heretic side. You didn’t change his mind, but, as with your interactions with Anna Raccoon, it shows that your work is getting noticed. I hope that will continue to build with time.
He’s most definitely not on the heretic side, no, which was why I brought it up. As you say, Mr Phil, it shows that HTOC is getting noticed. Whilst Pace is of the ‘hypersensitivity towards grooming’ crowd, and a self-proclaimed campaigner for student welfare, he is certainly no vigilante. In various debates I’ve found him to be extremely humane in his attitudes towards those with convictions, and he abhors the cries of the mob and calls for ‘understanding’.(this at least meets the debate a quarter of the way!). Where he differs from HTOC is essentially in the definition of offender and victim, which is obviously rather fundamental, but he is prepared to acknowledge grey areas and that relationships (such as teacher-student) and ‘grooming’ is not a black and white matter. I point this out, because I think it shows where HTOC is most effective – being at least heard by rational and educated people from the ‘unconverted’.
Phil: Ian Pace also has a blog. This related post, which can be read here also has an addendum, not addressed in his reply to Fox.
If I was living closer to you, I would buy a birthday cake and try and get you into a party mood. I think that we have to be realistic about this cause. We are not making a bridge from one year to the next but from one generation to the next. I just hope that when I depart this life, which I think will be about 50 years from now, I will have something more positive to pass on. In the mean time we will just have to cope with troughs!
Thanks, Adam! Christmas cake would do fine if I can catch up with you by then! I do hope you will be at least in sight of the Promised Lane when you are old and grey!
‘Director of Public Prosecutions called for non-reporting of “child sexual abuse” to be made a criminal offence.’
This is chilling indeed (or radioactive, as you say). I find this bitterly ironic, since a recent petition calling for a ‘Daniel’s law’, after Daniel Pelka – to make it compulsory to report any evidence of a child being starved or beaten to death in our midst – was dismissed by the MP concerned as ‘would have made no difference to Daniel’s fate,’ or words to that effect. This just confirms for me the impression I already got from my many Facebook debates with the Savilegate/,music school crusading crowd – that they’re desperately interested in enabling teenagers to cry abuse and prosecute 30 years on, but shrug their shoulders resignedly (I’ll do them the favour of not saying ‘indifferently’) about helping totally helpless babies in the here and now. The reason, it seems to me, is simple: a Daniel’s Law addresses the failings in the way the social services function, but the ‘child sexual abuse Law’ as espoused by the DOPP supports them in their dogma and neo-feminist agenda nicely (since, by ‘child’, they no doubt mean a 15yo as much as – if not more than – a 5yo).
Perhaps I’m a little wide of the mark on this one, correct me if I am.
Interesting and encouraging information, Phil. Your advice, too, is something I’ll certainly think about.
> Director of Public Prosecutions; ***ism. Whatever his name is.
Starmer, so Starmerism, which has a certain ring to it. He is being replaced, though, any time now, by a woman called Saunders, I think it is. If she turns out to be just as bad I suppose it would have to be Saundersism, which doesn’t really work. On the other hand which could just pair them together as the SS!
Just a follow-up to my last comment. The article below and petition by one Paula Barrow relates to Daniel Pelka specifically, which I was in favour of, but she seems to be allying herself to ‘Starmerism’ – in which case, I dunno…. the type of abuse suffered by little DP was clearly not a sexual issue in any shape or form, (‘sadistic’, or ‘evil’ I think suffices) and I fear what is going on here is a hijacking of the cause to protect vulnerable babies from parental grotesques by the brigade who wish to persecute the slightest consenting affection between anybody under 16 and anybody over 16.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/paula-barrow/child-abuse_b_4234294.html
‘This week Keir Starmer, the country’s most senior prosecutor, told BBC Panorama “I think the time has come to change the law… there should be a mandatory reporting provision. What you really need is a clear, direct law that everybody understands.” ‘
This is hugely important forum, Tom (I’d assumed it had been around for much more than 1 year!). “Does it aspire, immodestly, to change the world?” I think so, yes. I think we have to accept change will only come very slowly, and I liken the persecution of paedosexuality to that of homosexuality (which itself is not entirely evaporated). There is always a public enemy #1. It used to be witches, and more recently it was ‘commies’, and it always passes in a generation or two. There’s an exact parallel between people not being able to differentiate between a mere ‘leftie’ and Joseph Stalin, and pedosexuals and child-murderers. People are like that, unfortunately – ‘thick’, but eventually people become educated, and it passes. I agree with your sentiments, ‘not in my lifetime’, although I do think my 7yo son will be around to see the day when a self-proclaimed paedosexual is tolerated in polite society and ‘less feared’ shall we say. ‘Paedogeddon’, no, but Mcarthyism very much yes. IMO, it’s that exactly. Perhaps, at this rate we’ll be able to coin it after the Director of Public Prosecutions; ***ism. Whatever his name is. This type of labelling is what they do to us, so why not do it to them? An excellent method of combat, I feel.
People notice, and the arguments here do reach the wider public (something like the 6 degrees of separation rule I guess). Just as an example, the music school scandals: you may have heard of one Ian Pace, a luminary of the music world who busts a gut to have a public inquiry into this and to ‘safeguard young students everywhere’. Well, I can tell you, he quoted at least one of your entries from Heretic TOC in his Facebook debates (an arena where the slightest contrary narrative is usually brutally flamed). It was the “hold on already, there can’t be this many!” piece you wrote about the news of scandalous professors being unearthed. Some of the meat of your argument got quoted, about it being a license for middle-aged women to re-evaluate their past experiences as abuse (and more). Naturally, some readers shot at it in typically reflex fashion, but it goes to show you were noticed here, and ‘polite’ folk do get to hear about the pov’s expressed here. IMO this is how things will change – enlightened ideas inexorably seeping into the public consciousness,and Heretic TOC certainly plays a useful part in this.
I would recommend you do personally devote more time to book-writing and academia, since you are hugely capable in that, and I think those media carry greater credibility. You can take a step back a little from here perhaps, just enough to regulate things and put in your monthly contribution (since it is your blog!). As you’ve pointed out, over the year many quality posters have emerged, so there should be plenty to keep things ticking over. Twitter is indeed probably to be recommended, however (I’ve only recently learnt its rudiments!).
If possible, could you post a link to Ian Pace’s FB page in regards to that debate. I’ve looked though his FB page, but can’t find it.
I’ll try. I might not be able to find it as it was some months ago, and might have been in a group page rather than his own. I’ll have to do some trawling.
Found it. Sorry, this may be a long post, but not sure if you will be able to see said debate without being a member of the Facebook page, therefore I copy and paste the whole thing below:
Ian Pace
http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6352758.
The line between good teaching and abuse – comment – TES
http://www.tes.co.uk
We must not allow the horror of recent revelations to diminish the privileged relationship of music teacher and student
Like · · Unfollow Post · Share · 1 September at 18:34 via Mobile
Seen by 86
Ian Pace Claire Fox is a former RCP member who took a major shift to the libertarian right, is dismissive of multiculturalism, and has been accused of defending the right of Gary Glitter to download child porn, and so on. http://www.theguardian.com/…/nov/19/comment.radio/print
Stuart Jeffries talks to Claire Fox
http://www.theguardian.com
Stuart Jeffries finds Claire Fox still takes joy in riling the liberal left.
1 September at 19:06 · Like
Tamasine Anna Plowman Augh I find the last paragraph haunting and verging on offensive….grrrrrr
1 September at 20:25 via mobile · Like
Ian Pace Yes. I am going to write a full response to this.
1 September at 20:28 · Like
Ian Pace (and would urge anyone else with objections to add comments to it)
1 September at 20:28 · Like
Kate Morgan Admittedly, she does raise an interesting point about what might constitute ‘psychological and other abuse’, and her mention of ballet teaching as an example. One of my ballet teacher used to scream at kids in the class, and yell things like, ‘Has this child any brains?’ and ‘Stop thinking about the fish and chips you’re going to eat for tea!’ (the latter only ever said to a child who was overweight). Her comments were out of line, but it made us work harder and acheive what we might not have otherwise attained. She would also prod and poke us in the buttocks if we didn’t ‘hold our tail in’ (although never beat/hit anyone). Was it abuse? Many might argue yes, but that was/is the nature of ballet training, especially at specialist ballet schools, such as The Royal Ballet School, and perhaps a little more so in Russian ballet schools.
Also, Fox has a point about the potential number of false allegations too (it does happen), although most are probably legitimate.
However, the second link you provided was shocking! I certainly don’t share this woman’s beliefs. I do, however, think she makes some points of interest regarding the abuse at schools – but only to a point! Sexual abuse, is sexual abuse when touching approaches genital touching. That cannot be mistaken for anything else.
As for the last comment, that most definitely needs a response!
1 September at 22:52 via mobile · Like · 1
Fiona Troon Quite frankly, she’s scary.
5 September at 05:48 · Like
Fiona Troon Another example of off-handedly minimising and dismissing allegations of abuse under the guise of “defending” music. Grr!! Good teaching and nurturing of any kind are by nature non-abusive. It’s true that there is a very fine line between strict discipline and bullying though, and i have experienced this in various teaching situations as the student. However, surely an understanding of this comes down to good, rigorous teacher training and self-awareness, and an understanding of the degree of patience and skill needed to build real trust and respect with an individual? Why should people be deemed automatically capable/aware of this because they are experienced instrumentalists? I sometimes wonder whether one-to-one conservatory/specialist music school teachers should have supervision sessions like therapists do because, let’s face it, it’s no mean feat to train someone in such a specialised activity as instrumental music and also be the mentor many people are looking for in such a sensitive art form. I think we have a long way to go in understanding and training teachers in the “privileged” nature of one-to-one teaching.
5 September at 05:56 · Like · 2
Fiona Troon Also, i think that there is a tendency in the UK Classical Music business to believe that once someone holds this kind of teaching position, they know all they need to know and require no further training or instruction (if indeed they had any in the first place.) This is surely misguided and a disadvantage to both teacher and student? The best teachers/nurtures/therapists/parents etc etc seem to me to be those most genuinely interested in their OWN self-development and how this relates to their ability to help others learn.
5 September at 05:59 · Like · 2
Ian Pace There is no *necessary* reason why a good player should be a good teacher; some can be excellent at one, poor at another.
5 September at 07:43 via mobile · Like · 2
Ian Pace All the views of people in this group, and many others, should also be heard publicly, not just those likely to agree with Claire Fox.
5 September at 07:48 via mobile · Like
Fiona Troon Feel free to quote me!
6 September at 03:02 · Like
Ian Pace Now a new comment at the bottom of the TES article declares that: ‘”Innocent until proven guilty” really does not apply any more in the UK. And people such as Ian Pace are simply fuelling an environment of paranoia and mistrust which is looking more like a witchhunt every day. ‘
And in another piece elsewhere, we read: ‘Guess what the figure is now for those music teachers? I was shocked by five of them being in trouble. Well now (or at the latest count), there are thirty nine, yes, THIRTY NINE, music teachers under investigation at that academy, Chetham’s school of music, plus one other, the Royal Northern College of Music, both in Manchester.
Enough already! Enough of this lunacy for one day!’
(from http://tomocarroll.wordpress.com/tag/chethams/ )
More people who think the worst thing is to seriously investigate such allegations as have remained hidden for too long – and that does not mean to drop the presumption of innocence.
Posts about Chetham’s on Heretic TOC
tomocarroll.wordpress.com
Posts about Chetham’s written by tomocarroll
8 September at 20:01 · Like · 1
Fiona Troon “It can’t possibly be happening THAT much!” Wake up people!
8 September at 22:37 · Like · 1
Interesting. It’s not clear why Ian Pace visited H-TOC in the first place or what he made of the heresies he found, if he stayed long enough to do so. The H-TOC blog in question did not mention the name Chetham’s, so he cannot have found H-TOC by using that search term.
With paedophile web forums hacked by vigilantes or shut down by police, with efforts being made to censor films and books, this is one of the few remaining means by which it’s possible to share information, ideas and solidarity. It must indeed be a difficult job running this place, but I for one am very grateful that you’ve done so.
[TOC: Thanks! Much appreciated.]
I, also, aspire, immodestly, to change the world, but probably not in my lifetime. . .
Hopefully, however, I will make some small contribution to the foundation upon which out successors will be able to build. . .
I await your next pronouncement with baited (cinnamon?) breath 🙂