The pencil is mightier than the sword?

Heretic TOC welcomes Peter Herman’s return as a guest blogger today, exactly a year after his first piece, Skateboarding as metaphor for social shifts. Peter, a veteran activist, remains an occasional contributor to the NAMBLA website.

JE SUIS STEVEN ADRIAN FREEMAN

Worldwide, anger was expressed over the despicable murder of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, fast followed by equally predictable outrage over the magazine’s latest depiction of the prophet Muhammad in the wake of those deaths.
One of the preferred symbols of solidarity with those who created the cartoons is the pencil. Such was the case recently in London’s Trafalgar Square. It is very likely that none there knew of the imprisonment of former PIE leader Steven Adrian Freeman for his “offensive” erotic pencil drawings of children. Even if someone there had known of Steve’s incarceration, it is unlikely they would have grasped the irony.
When it comes to children’s sexuality no amount of rationalization concerning prohibitions on the child’s expression of it or the adult finding joy in it ever seems over the top. It has come to a point where, in many parts of the English speaking world, any image of youthful sexuality and even written descriptions of it will at the very least ostracize the individual, land him in jail or possibly get him killed.
Just as many Muslims are truly offended by any ridicule of the tenets of their religion, many individuals are horrified by the idea that children can be sexual and that some might even find pleasure in depicting such behaviour. The question is whether real harm is ever done by either forms of expression and whether they should ever be prohibited anywhere.
The sincerely religious would perceive that an almighty deity does not need murderous thugs to defend him or his prophet. As many Muslims accept, especially perhaps those who have been brought up in countries with a tradition of free speech and free artistic expression, God is not harmed by cartoons. The only “harm” is the loudly proclaimed offence taken by extremists who seek to bludgeon into silence anyone with views at odds with their own. This is understood by all who proclaim “Je suis Charlie”.
Artistic depictions of childhood sexuality are likewise not intrinsically harmful, and they too provoke irrational outrage. As the panic over “child sexual abuse” has become ever more manic, even non-religious “liberals” have found their commitment to freedom of expression foundering on this issue. Concern was focused initially on the potential abuse of children featured in photographic images. That was at least a debatable issue. The irrationality of the public mood is exposed more clearly, though, when drawings of children are considered beyond the pale, or when sexy cartoon kids are likewise not to be tolerated, such as are to be found in the Japanese manga tradition.
What is all this anger about? Cartoon abuse?
This bizarre madness flies in the face of scientific evidence, which is seldom allowed to surface in public discourse. Consequently, few are aware of it and hence never realise the stark gulf that exists between their beliefs and reality.
Following surveys in a number of countries, including, Denmark, Germany, Japan and the Czech Republic, a strong association has been demonstrated between the ready availability of pornography and reduced levels of sexual offending, including against children. Research also shows that non-coercive sexual acts with minors, in themselves, do not result in psychological trauma.
So what to make of all the marching and expressions of solidarity with Charlie Hebdo? Only that humans will continue being blind to the inconsistencies between reality and their cherished beliefs. Charlie Hebdo appears also to have been equally blind. Though they made fun of the Catholic Church for ignoring abuse by priests, to my knowledge, they never dealt with society’s current hysteria on child sexuality that is equally if not more deserving of ridicule.
TOC ADDS:
STEVE FREEMAN
I had occasion to write about Steven Adrian Freeman, my successor as chair of PIE, in Heretic TOC last July. See PIE spy, with my tabloid eye… That was a piece about the 1980s when he was still using his original surname, Smith. He later changed to Steven Adrian before opting in more recent years for the full current moniker. In the earlier piece, I said he was doing time for “porn”. More precisely, he was convicted in May 2011 of distributing indecent photographs, and was subsequently given an indeterminate sentence with a minimum term of 30 months. Three co-defendants were found guilty of possession and another of failing to disclose a computer password to police; they were sentenced to lesser prison terms. When police first raided Steve’s house in 2008, the law banning “obscene” art depicting children had not been enacted. Soon after the new measure was passed the following year, the police returned and secured the case against him.
So, although Steve’s case made legal history as the first under the new law (the Coroners and Justice Act 2009) against art, he was already in deep trouble. Extremely deep. A minimum term of 30 months may sound bearable, but that time has long since passed and I have picked up no indications of his imminent release. It is even difficult to find out, because any attempt by him to communicate with his former co-defendants, or any other friends who might be thought to share his views, could jeopardise his release, which will depend on him taking and “passing” a sex offender treatment programme. In other words, he will have to convince the Parole Board he has changed his ways, and that will include distancing himself from “anti-social influences”. Steve is in any case a stubborn guy who sticks to his guns. My guess is he will find it hard to do the necessary grovelling: it would mean, at the very least, saying he is sorry for what he did and also sounding sincere about it.
It’s a nightmare. Indeterminate sentences have now been discontinued, but Steve’s still stands and he finds himself trapped in a penal backwater. God only knows how long he is going to be stuck there.
There was one bit of good news last year, though, which shows his creative side is still finding expression, and I do not mean erotic art.
He won English PEN’s Prison Writing competition for a piece called The Gates of Ytan, in which he put himself into the mind of a fox. One of the judges was Mark Haddon no less, author of The Curious Incident Of The Dog In The Night Time, in which the author famously imagined the thinking of an autistic boy. There were over 400 entries for the competition. The Gates of Ytan and other stories is now an e-book anthology featuring winners in the prize’s various categories.
LOLICON AND SHOTACON
The prophet has not quite monopolised media coverage of cartoons in Britain lately. The BBC aired Should Comics Be Crimes? a programme in the Radio 4 Crossing Continents strand earlier this month. It can still be heard, and there is a full written report by the programme’s presenter, James Fletcher.
The broadcast includes some remarkably relaxed and frank interviews with fans and producers of erotic manga featuring young girls (lolicon) and boys (shotacon) in Japan, where such material is a long-established part of mainstream culture.
But will it last? Pressure from the west resulted in a law against photographic child porn in 1999; last year this was extended to possession. But DVDs featuring even very young kids in sexy poses are still going strong, even though, according to one anti-porn campaigner, they are illegal. And cartoon erotica featuring hard core child sex is openly on sale in manga supermarkets.
Apparently the next big push to obliterate this distinctively Japanese cultural phenomenon can be expected as part of the country’s preparations to host the 2020 Olympic Games: there will be further outside pressure, we are told, to present the country as “cool” not “weird”.
AND IN OTHER NEWS…
MORE VICIOUS LIES
Exaro news has upped its public profile with tabloid scoops recently based on unearthing archived public documents touching upon the supposed paedophilic scandals in high places decades ago. While the scandals themselves may be chimerical, the documents themselves are real enough, and this enterprising agency is to be congratulated on its assiduous digging.
Lately, though, Exaro has fallen for the temptation to give credence and publicity to some tall-sounding stories pedalled by so-called “victims” who could well be ex-rent boys on the make. Yarns about the violent abuse and even murder of teenage boys by VIPs in Westminster doubtless make a nice little earner.
I was appalled and disgusted to find that one such story involves my former PIE associates the late Peter Righton and Charles Napier, about whom I wrote recently in Hi, this is Charles. I’ve been a naughty boy…
Here’s a taster:

“Darren’s first encounter aged 15 with urbane Peter Righton in a country estate in Suffolk left him truly terrified. Righton is with his old friend, an erudite teacher by the name of Charles Napier. Righton, former government advisor on child care and one of Britain’s leading specialists on the subject at the time, tells Darren to give Napier oral sex. Darren refuses. So Righton beats him mercilessly, punching and kicking the bewildered 15-year-old until he does precisely as he was told…”

I left my response to this crap at the Exaro website. Fortunately, it is the first item in the comments section. Not that I seem to have made much impression on the subsequent commentators. They and others, unfortunately, will believe what they want.
WHEEN’S WHINES
Francis Wheen, deputy editor of Private Eye is the prizewinning author of a much translated biography of Karl Marx; he also won the Orwell Prize (prize irony there, I feel) for his collected journalism, and is a regular panellist on high-profile British satirical shows The News Quiz and Have I Got News for You? Interestingly, he even penned a biography of one-time adultophile Tom Driberg, a politician who, when he was just 13 years old, paid a tramp for sex.
With all that distinguished work in his CV, you’d think Wheen would have better things to do than obsess over his former teacher Charles Napier, against whom he has carried on a gratuitously spiteful vendetta for decades. And you’d think he’d have better things to do than complain about my blog on Charles.
But you’d be wrong! He tweeted recently to tell his nearly 6,000 followers of his “outrage” at my coverage. The WordPress stats show the hits at Heretic TOC shooting up around that time from the usual 250 per day or so to over 1000. Interestingly, not one of the extra visitors flamed. Maybe they liked my story!
Speaking of the Orwell Prize, the late Richard Webster was nominated for his wonderful book The Secret of Bryn Estyn: The Making of a Modern Witch Hunt (2005), which exposed as baseless many of the complaints alleging sexual abuse in Welsh children’s homes in the 1990s. But the theme was unfashionable and the book was largely ignored by the British press. Catherine Bennett, no softie on child abuse, credited Webster with exposing “the hysteria and false accusations”, writing that uncritical press reports on the issue demonstrate “the insatiable human appetite for narratives of evil”. Quite so.
AMAZON BACK PEDALS
Amazon.ca, the Canadian Amazon website, is perfectly happy, it seems, to publicise and sell Chelsea Rooney’s novel Pedal, which gives paedophilia a human face, as we saw in Dissident’s review for Heretic TOC in At last, the paedophile as hero! recently.
They were less thrilled, though, to receive a customer review of the book from me. The moderators turned it down! Why? Well, it can’t be because I slagged the book off. I made some criticisms but overall my review was positive and I gave it four stars, if I remember rightly.
Could it be because my review was too brazenly pro-paedophile in a way the discreet blurb for the novel itself is not? Or because I freaked them out by posting in my own name, taking issue with the author’s references to my book Paedophilia: The Radical Case? Or because the company banned this very book’s Amazon page a couple of years ago as part of a panic response when they were accused of promoting paedophilia? Or all of these things?
Whatever, I couldn’t be bothered to alter my review in an attempt to make it compliant with their poxy guidelines. I’d have to change too much, including my opinions. I might give it a try at a rival website. In the meantime, any Heretic TOC readers interested can now see this review exclusively, as banned by Amazon, at Dropbox.
POP’S LOLITA MOMENT
Japan may be under pressure to turn western, but the Anglophone obsession with the supposed “sexualisation” of kids continues apace, with an outcry over Australian singer Sia’s Elastic Heart pop video. Tom Slater, of Spiked, did an article about it, which saves me the trouble, including a link to the video itself. Actor Shia LaBeouf is seen, as Slater puts it, “in a balletic set-to with 12-year-old dance prodigy Maddie Ziegler. Both dressed in skin-tight, flesh-coloured underwear, they chase, swipe, embrace, entwine, bite and scratch one another in giant cage”. Hot stuff!

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of

20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[…] Steve Freeman, my successor as chair of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), barbarically incarcerated on […]

[…] In relating the anger expressed over the murder of Charlie Hebdo cartoonists, Peter Herman in Heretic TOC highlighted the following bitter irony: “It has come to a point where, in many parts of the […]

[…] Prisons Inspectorate, the Prison Governors’ Association, staff, prisoners and their families”. Steven Adrian Freeman, my successor as chair of PIE, has been languishing in prison on one of the sentences long after […]

[…] I just happened to know personally about the allegations. So, remember, you heard it here first! In The pencil is mightier than the sword, and then Exposé outfit murders its own credibility a couple of months later, this blog focused on […]

Hello from the far east! I’ve spent the last few weeks reading your blog and researching this topic, and I am truely impressed with your posts, and somewhat disturbed about the obsession with paedophilia in the UK & US. I am intrigued that the media and courts continue to insist that teenagers are ‘children’ in the 21st century. It’s interesting to me, because, adolescence is a 20th century creation – Before that you were either a child or an adult, there was no inbetween. Now it seems some countries in the world are creating this concept that a young adult, or adolescent, is a child, and is still somekind of pure, innocent being without the right to consent to their sexual identity and instincts. It’s as if the people writing the legislation were never young themselves. But this is not what I wanted to comment about this time.
I would just like to add that during the BBC coverage about Lolicon manga in Japan, they mentioned that a certain anti-porn campaigner said the ‘Child’ DVDs are illegal. This is not the case. They are sold (along with magazines and photobooks featuring children, mostly teenagers) openly everywhere. This includes music shops, DVD stores, libraries, convenience stores and ofcourse multiple online retailers. They are not pornographic and there is no ‘true’ nudity as that was outlawed in 1999. I’m not saying it’s a perfect industry, but it’s not like people assume it to be. I also noticed that during the interview they pointed out a 5 or 6 year old girl model. These types of DVDs are actually not that common and don’t represent the industry – In my experience the most popular models are between the ages of 11-15. Just do a search for ‘Saaya Irie’ for example, who was very popular about a decade ago and is still quite popular today as a 20-something Gravure model. She is a prime example of the beauty of Junior Idols in Japan. It’s not just about sex, it’s about beauty and cuteness. The Japanese modelling companies are typically highly professional, strict, high budget and closely regulated. There are no ‘nipple-slips’ or ‘transparent clothes’ or anything like that, as you would expect with certain controversial Russian or European Teen model companies. The point is, they comply with the current laws.
Hundreds of model DVDs and photobooks are released every month in Japan, many of them featuring models under the age of 18 (but anything under 18 has to be ‘non-nude’). In addition every release is thoroughly checked before release by a regulating authority which ensure the releases are not against the law. The sexualization of children (or more specifically, young adults such as teenagers) is commonplace in Japan and widely accepted, even amongst the models themselves whom regulary share about their experiences on blogs, twitter and various outlets. Only in recent years has there been immense pressure from Western organizations to more stricly regulate these industries and for some, do-away with them entirely. But if they do succeed and finally drill the ‘last nail’ in the coffin of the Junior modelling industry, it will only drive them underground and cause more problems than it solves – and at the same time it will put thousands of models and potential future talent out of work, too. And then it will alienate (and possibly criminalize) hundreds of thousands of fans in Japan alone.
I should stress that this is not a ‘niche’ industry by a long shot. It’s widespread and nearly everyone, at least once, has seen a Junior Idol picture or DVD. You don’t need to be a fan to see it, as models appear on TV, in the streets, on billboards, in magazines etc. And you can be certain that everyone has seen Gravure models, some of which are under 18. So if you applied the laws of say, the UK, to Japan, everyone overnight would become a potential criminal simply because everyone has seen it at least once. What does that say? I don’t know, but if I had the time I would continue writing about it! Assuming I read things correctly, here’s an interesting fact – if you took certain frames from the ‘Elastic Heart’ music video you mentioned in your post, and saved them as pictures, I believe you could be charged for possession of indecent images (category 1) in the UK if they were found during a search? That just shows you how ridiculous it has become in your part of the world. In fact, the visuals in Junior Idol DVDs are not that different from that music video. If you took out the male actor, added various bright costumes and locations, you’d have a Junior Idol DVD.
And it doesn’t stop there – The Japanese porn industry is well known for producing thousands of titles every month, many of which feature young looking women. To the undiscerning eye some of the ‘lolita’ themed releases could easily be mistaken as child pornography, despite all the participants being over the age of 18. I think I remember reading somewhere that Austrailia banned small-chested pornography because of it. Women in Japan (and South Korea, parts of China and other far eastern countries) are always trying to look as youthful as possible. Youthfullness is adored by much of the general public in this part of the world. Just because someone is ‘under 18’ doesn’t mean they cannot be admired, sexually or otherwise. And the concept of it being somehow strange or illegal to be attracted to a minor is a relatively new one in Japan. But that doesn’t mean all Japanese men (and women) are potential criminals.
At the end of the day porn and sex is everywhere in Japan and it is here to stay, regardless of the West’s pointless war on sex and indecency. An example of fine censorship is when South Korea banned all online pornography a few years ago and continues to ‘attempt’ blocking websites via a government firewall. But despite that, guess who are one of the biggest consumers of pornography in the world? Yup, South Korea. They also have one of the highest number of prostitutes in the developed world (despite it being ‘illegal’). I would imagine the same rings true for much of the Western world, too. You can regulate porn (and ‘indecent’ images) out of sight to your hearts content, but it will always be there. Driving it deeper underground can only have negative affects. There has to be a balance, a common ground, and the West’s approach is far from balanced.

Fascinating information. Thank you.
Some time ago I was interested to read (on Paraphilias Forums?) that Junior Idol stuff tends to be divided into age categories: 15-17, 10-14, 6-9 and under 6. Do you know if this is the case?

Thank you for such an insightful post about this subject, Khongoro. And nice to meet you!
Part of the reason, I strongly believe, that the U.S. and U.K. do not seek any type of common sense balance in their relentless attempts to criminalize any and all instances of youth sexual expression, and any adult who is caught admiring such expression, is because this is primarily a moral issue they dealing with. Almost all U.S. and U.K. pundits will be loathe to admit the moralizing crux behind this crusade, and will instead vehemently insist that it’s exclusively a safety issue, and is entirely about “protecting” youths from what they nebulously define as “exploitation.” I’m sure many of them are well aware that driving such an industry underground would simply make matters truly bad for youths and turn numerous decent citizens into criminals, but due to the moralistic basis of these laws, matters of practicality, logistics, and common sense are not an issue for them. They believe that by making it a heavily-enforced crime simply to view such imagery, they are driving an important moral “point” into the collective zeitgeist of society. To them, that’s the most important thing.
Driven so heavily by emotion, these laws and their likely negative consequences for democracy and liberty, not to mention the actual safety of younger people, are not supposed to make any kind of logical sense, nor have any real logical or beneficial outcome. They are simply intended to make an iron-fisted “point,” and to see to it that all adults and youths alike who violate this sacrosanct moralizing paradigm – that anyone under 18 (or 16) are essentially asexual and must never be admired or behave in a sexual way – are heavily punished.

The latest big shocker in the US is a photo of fourteen-year-old Willow Smith wearing a top with a picture of breasts on it. An article by Rebecca Deczynski in Nylon magazine (not linking due to photo) stated “…last May, she also received backlash for then posing in bed with shirtless 20-year-old actor Moises Arias, to which her mother Jada Pinkett Smith responded with disgust that the photo would even be interpreted as sexual. While society as a whole rejects the notion that a 14-year-old can understand and embrace her own sexuality, it also refuses to accept that a young girl can be in control of her body in a way that also isn’t inherently sexual at all. The issue is that there is no space between 14 and 18 (the legal age of consent) for a teenager to exist. Either they are a sexual creature, or they are not; the process for exploration is something with which society feels incredibly uncomfortable.” Quite so.

Small wonder, as this attitude has been pounded into their dismal minds for the last several decades!

Thank you sharing this, A. I’m glad that there are a growing number of thoughtful authors in the midst of the still thriving moral panic over underage youths expressing their sexuality – either real or imagined by the hysterical adults interpreting certain instances that way – who call it like it is. It’s a good sign when a number of intelligent people become sick and tired of a certain hysteria, to the point where they no longer “hold their tongue” about speaking against it. It’s an even better sign when the editorial crew of a mainstream magazine like Nylon allow such an admonishment of a popular moral hysteria to be published within their pages (though that particular mag has never been overtly unfriendly to youth expression, I must say).

Addendum: I also think it’s an important sign of the times when young girl celebrities like Willow Smith continually provide forms of passive but notable resistance to attempts by popular culture to “neuter” their natural curiosity and sexual awareness by raising hell every time one of them is caught in an even mild form of such expression.
And luckily for Willow, she isn’t under contract with Disney, who would impose a relentless morals clause over her, just as they do with all the young actresses under their stable; and just as they did several times to poor Miley Cyrus whenever she was caught in the scandalous act of behaving like a real teenager (i.e., young adult). Miley has certainly been backlashing against that stifling of her natural expression after leaving Disney’s contractual control, but sadly, she had to wait until after she was 18 and thus a legal adult before she could publicly, or even not-so-publicly, behave contrary to Hannah Montana, and the other legions of idealized teens force fed to our culture by Disney.

Here is Ipce’s handy summary of research on the effects of pornography: https://www.ipce.info/ipceweb/Library/01aug10a_studies.htm
I remember reading about Freeman’s case at the time and wondering why it was passing almost unnoticed. Anyone wishing to read his article on doings at PIE after TOC was imprisoned for the first time need only mosey on over to Ian Pace’s blog, where it is titled ‘PIE — Documentary Evidence 7 — Steven Adrian Smith’s History of the Movement’.
Interestingly, I’ve heard that many Japanese manga which depict older boys in romantic relationships with younger boys are chiefly aimed at teenaged girls. According to this http://en.rocketnews24.com/2014/07/25/internet-survey-sheds-light-on-how-japanese-women-deal-and-sometimes-dont-deal-with-the-hair-down-there/ it is relatively uncommon for Japanese women to remove their pubic hair. Could this possibly be because Japanese men who are into young girls have a legal and socially-sanctioned outlet for their desires in the form of child erotica? After all, back when child porn was legal in Western European countries, ‘full bush’ was the norm in adult porn. Mind you, I’m sceptical about the Paedophilia Theory of pubic hair removal. Men typically no longer sport luxuriant beards and moustaches and are getting ‘back, sack and crack’ waxes in increasing numbers, but nobody suggests that this is because most women really want to have sex with young boys and are just making do with adults. One regular contributor to Metafilter has worked at a major porn producer for years. He says that the company is always getting letters from men of all ages and types who want to see more porn actresses with pubic hair, or more pubic hair on porn actresses. In his view, many porn actresses shave their pubic hair largely because it makes for easier cleanup between scenes.
I always thought Shia LaBoeuf was a woman! Shows how out of touch I am, I guess. The Elastic Heart video puts me in mind of two other pieces of moviemaking. One is the 2002 film Les Diables (on Dailymotion, no subtitles), in which a severely autistic girl and her brother (or is he?) abscond from a care home together. The girl and boy kiss and touch one another and in one scene she dances to music coming from a prison window, unaware that her dance is arousing the men inside, who holler for more. The boy is played by Vincent Rottiers, fourteen, and the girl by Adèle Haenel, twelve and a half. Now a successful actress who wears pretty much whatever the heck she likes (good for her), Haenel has reflected in an interview on her part in that film, which was her first acting role. She said that she took the semi-naked kissing scenes very much in her stride: being twelve, she just went ahead and did them, whereas if she’d been thirteen or fourteen she’d have felt more self-conscious. The only scene that upset her was the dance outside the prison: after shooting that, she phoned her mother. The other film I thought of is the documentary The Twinkles: Chasing Perfection (on YouTube), about an all-star cheerleading team entirely made up of girls 8-12. They practice hard and often, wear skimpy outfits and makeup and are tossed around in the air by male coaches, and they apparently love every minute of it: if they didn’t, they wouldn’t be able to put up with the tough discipline.

If indeterminate sentences have been discontinued, how can they keep Steve in prison after he has done his time?

Japan’s culture seems to adore children and their sexuality. It’s not unique either. I remember reading of a north American native culture that adored the genitals of children, in fact my family does with at least those up to toddler age (though overall my family is still very anti-sexual), where as the native culture did it up until near the teens and they were open to youth sexuality and exploration.
The west has tried to impart its negative sexual culture on other cultures numerous times, notably to certain Scandinavian countries. I have had a few paedosexuals tell me about the openness to adult/child sexuality that Scandinavian countries had. Including selling child porn magazines openly.
The west is like a cancer in the sexual regard of Earth’s human culture. When one does research on how open and free sexuality (including for children!) keeps humanity peaceful and helps us work together then one can see the danger of imparting negative sexuality on the world.
It’s one of the many reasons, as a non, I have come to support the pro-adult/child sexuality pedosexual stance. There is nothing bad or disgusting about sexual interactions when consensual. What is bad or disgusting is forcing it to happen or not to happen.
Steven Adrian Freeman is another free speech martyr, but even those who claim to be adamant supporters of free speech would rarely openly support him. It goes to show how fickle people can be depending on how they are raised. My kids will not be raised to hate anyone of any sexuality nor will that be raised to look down on consensual sexuality.

In response to Peter’s piece concerning child sexuality, I would like to add an extract from John DeCecco’s interview in Paidika 3, which, incidentally, I found truly fascinating. Although penned a quarter of a century ago, what he had to say is probably even more true today:
“One thing that attracts me to the study of paedophilia is that it allows the possibility of an inquiry into childhood sexuality, free from normative models that have occupied our attention in the past, particularly the psychoanalytic model of stages of heterosexual development. I see it as a chance to determine how children in their own ways, yet to be described, and in varied fashions, yet to be discovered, can be and are sexual, and how adults, as the mentors and teachers of children, unavoidably, will have some kind of role in that development, apart from just standing outside and observing it, which would be very unusual for anyone who really cared for a child. I don’t think we know much about the sexual development of children, apart from heterosexual models, which say that a child at eight should be repressing sexuality and at puberty it suddenly floods forward, and ultimately leads to fatherhood and motherhood.
Maybe the inquiry should be framed differently; not an inquiry into paedophilia per se, but an inquiry into childhood sexuality and the roles that adults play in that, including the sexual role. We’ve maintained the preposterous stance in Western society that the adult has no part in that, or that the part is simply that of an observer, and yet in almost every other aspect of children’s lives the adults are participants as well as observers. We’ve put a fence around the sexual area, and said: ‘This you must stand outside of’. So my feeling is, the better route to go is to say that paedophilia is part of the broad inquiry into sexuality, the meaning and the experience of sexuality in an individual’s life, including children, and not frame it too narrowly as paedophilia. If you narrow the inquiry to ‘paedophiles’, to the adults, you’re going to deflect it away from the children, and you are going to deflect it away from the broader examination of the sources of heterosexual oppression and prejudice.” (John DeCecco interview, Paidika 3, 1988)
“Whenever any government, or any church, or anyone else for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects: ‘This book you may not read, this film you may not watch, this image you may not see, this knowledge you may not have,’ then the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives.” (Robert A. Heinlein, “If This Goes On…”, 1940)

Oh… Thank you, Tom! ??

20
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Scroll to Top